Board Is Dead…
- By hessebear
- The Bears' Lair
- 6 Replies
So I thought I’d try to get a discussion going. I took a shot at rating each group on a scale from 1-5, with 5 being in the top of the country, 4 top half of the conference, 3 middle of the pack in the conference, 2 being in the bottom half of the conference, and 1 gawd awful.
QBs - 2.5, could swing up or down depending on how good Jackson is
OL - 3, maybe this is more hopeful than reality, but I like some of the additions they’ve made
TE - 2, this appears to be one of the weaker groups on the team IMO
RB - 4, one of the strengths of the team. Ott is a dominant player, I’m hoping Cardwell can play, and I’m intrigued by JWT.
WR - 3.5, this could be higher, but there are some unknowns for backups. I hope that Hunter will be one of the best in the conference, but there are a lot of good WRs in the PAC.
ST - 1.5, new K and P (which is almost never good), overly conservative returning has been a hallmark for Wilcox, and coverage has never been great in his tenure. I do like Hunter as a PR if he is allowed to do something other than fair catch. I will be pleasantly surprised to be wrong here.
DL - 3, this depends a lot on how well Brett J comes back. I like Saunders a lot. Depth is a concern.
LB - 3.5, I’m a big Carlton fan and I hope he turns a corner this year. Sirmon is very good albeit not very exciting. I also like Jernigan. WILL side has some unknowns with Elarms-Orr and Allen. The potential is here for this to be an outstanding unit, but we are also an injury away from being average IMO. Blitzing capabilities will be key for generating some semblance of a pass rush.
DB - 4, I’m very high on our secondary (and the coaching there). I love Earby and Hearns and am a fan of Woodie and Woodson. Lots of good depth, too. This unit has a chance to be one of the best in the country, and they may need to be if we don’t create a pass rush.
Coaching - 3, this could go up if Wilcox gives Spavital the freedom to be aggressive and if Sirmon junks the bend-but-don’t-break philosophy. But I just haven’t seen Wilcox teams make adjustments or game plan as well as others in the conference (e.g., Smith), so I fear the coaching will always be mediocre in this reign.
Team - 3, I think we have a chance to be decent and maybe even finish with a winning record in the Pac, but we aren’t going to challenge for the championship. We might be a bit better than average, but also could be a lot worse. I’m thinking a 3 is about right here.
Thoughts?
QBs - 2.5, could swing up or down depending on how good Jackson is
OL - 3, maybe this is more hopeful than reality, but I like some of the additions they’ve made
TE - 2, this appears to be one of the weaker groups on the team IMO
RB - 4, one of the strengths of the team. Ott is a dominant player, I’m hoping Cardwell can play, and I’m intrigued by JWT.
WR - 3.5, this could be higher, but there are some unknowns for backups. I hope that Hunter will be one of the best in the conference, but there are a lot of good WRs in the PAC.
ST - 1.5, new K and P (which is almost never good), overly conservative returning has been a hallmark for Wilcox, and coverage has never been great in his tenure. I do like Hunter as a PR if he is allowed to do something other than fair catch. I will be pleasantly surprised to be wrong here.
DL - 3, this depends a lot on how well Brett J comes back. I like Saunders a lot. Depth is a concern.
LB - 3.5, I’m a big Carlton fan and I hope he turns a corner this year. Sirmon is very good albeit not very exciting. I also like Jernigan. WILL side has some unknowns with Elarms-Orr and Allen. The potential is here for this to be an outstanding unit, but we are also an injury away from being average IMO. Blitzing capabilities will be key for generating some semblance of a pass rush.
DB - 4, I’m very high on our secondary (and the coaching there). I love Earby and Hearns and am a fan of Woodie and Woodson. Lots of good depth, too. This unit has a chance to be one of the best in the country, and they may need to be if we don’t create a pass rush.
Coaching - 3, this could go up if Wilcox gives Spavital the freedom to be aggressive and if Sirmon junks the bend-but-don’t-break philosophy. But I just haven’t seen Wilcox teams make adjustments or game plan as well as others in the conference (e.g., Smith), so I fear the coaching will always be mediocre in this reign.
Team - 3, I think we have a chance to be decent and maybe even finish with a winning record in the Pac, but we aren’t going to challenge for the championship. We might be a bit better than average, but also could be a lot worse. I’m thinking a 3 is about right here.
Thoughts?