I'll be handling all the press conferences today in place of Jesse. Here's the schedule. I'll post any notable updates:

11:30 am Justin Wilcox Media Availability (Zoom)
Noon Peter Sirmon Media Availability (Zoom)
12:15 pm Bill Musgrave Media Availability (Zoom)
1:00 pm Jack Plummer Media Availability (Zoom)
6:30 pm Daniel Scott Media Availability (Zoom)
6:45 pm Matthew Cindric Media Availability (Zoom)

And I'm getting caught up on other stuff I have coming too. Bear with me and there will be multiple pieces coming your way today.

Just realized he is from the same HS as Goff. Anyone reminder his recruiting story - Iowa seems a weird destination. Was Cal ever a possibility?

Jesse's follow-up piece:

@Ryan Young could we get a weekly article covering how far along players with redshirt eligibility are from hitting the game limit? Also one with a snap count for each player who saw the field in the last game, provided you have access to PFF stats? Both are useful in tracking how players are utilized. Thank you

Here’s another post-game dump in a bit different format:

Positives
(Admittedly this will be a shorter list)
The secondary played really well especially taking away UNLV’s playmaker WR, the transfer from MSU. Hearns was dominant throughout especially considering that for most of the game we had no pash rush. Scott had another stellar game and his two late-game blitzes saved the win. And the nice INT by Young at the end capped it off.
Kickoffs were all good - almost all touchbacks.
Sheehan is a really good punter. He had two kicks go in the end zone that should have been downed. He’s a weapon.
Croteau had a good game and made several good plays. Sirmon looked even better and made several important stops as well. Oladejo was everywhere. Carlton also had a nice sack.
Ott looked just as dangerous to everyone except evidently Cal’s offensive coaches. Only a few touches but two TDs and an electric run that he came close to breaking. Give him the damn ball.
Latu looks like a good receiving TE and had several nice grabs.
No injuries that I saw, always a good thing. Hunter got drilled but came back but didn’t do much - hopefully he’s ok.
Defense looked passive until it really mattered but then flipped the switch. On the last three drives by UNLV, they were money. They have the potential to be really good but I think the play calling needs to be a lot more aggressive.

Negatives
The OL looked just awful especially on pass protection. I saw multiple guys just get bull rushed and knocked way back or just beaten by speed. By UNLV - I mean, cmon. The running lanes were also minimal. This is a real problem and limits this team’s potential big time.
Plummer was not impressive. In fact he looked like a bottom-tier QB in the Pac12 IMO even though his stats weren’t terrible. His passes fluttered, he often did not hit WRs in stride, his INT was terrible, and he did nothing but look like a deer in the headlights in the second half. Yes, the OL was bad, but there were still plays to be made and he didn’t make them. I think he will get better, but he appears to only be an incremental improvement over Garbers at best.
Why oh why didn’t Ott play more? It was the most idiotic thing I’ve seen in a long time. If AT is the one deciding this, he needs his authority taken away. It was preposterous in the extreme that Brooks got more touches. I just don’t get it. Why?
Special teams other than punting and kickoffs were atrocious. A key missed FG, penalty on a punt, giving up an onside kick, and nothing on returns. Just another debacle in a long string of them. When will it ever end?
The DL had no pass rush on their own and only when blitzes were added in was there any pressure. We just don’t have that top-notch pass rusher. Carlton is probably at the top of the list right now but he’s like a big LB instead of a DL guy. What happened to Saunders being such a stud? He looked mediocre today.
Mavin Anderson looks really good but made two bad plays - catching the KO out of bounds and dropping the TD pass, which while a bit high, was catchable. Especially egregious because Plummer threw the INT on the next play. The other receivers were fine but not very exciting and disappeared in the second half.
Our WR blocking is once again awful. Every WR screen goes nowhere because no one can block.
Too many dumb penalties right at the start of a drive. This offense isn’t good enough to overcome that. Stop it.
A lack of turnovers. We need takeaways to beat teams IMO and we only had the one at the end of the game. We need more.
The offensive play calling in the second half was atrocious. The three handoffs at the end were embarrassing. The running game lacks creativity as does the offense in general (they ran one sad reverse. Everything else was boring, plain Jane.) And they did nothing to help a QB under pressure almost every play, just very telegraphed screens. Just terrible. And did I mention it was incredible they didn’t play Ott more? Just crazy. Absolutely insane.

In summary, you could say a win is a win, and it’s great to be 2-0, but today showed that this team has too many serious issues with players and staff to be a good team. Despite the win, this was one of the more disappointing games I’ve seen right up there with last year’s Arizona and Nevada games.

They may surprise someone, but anyone looking at today’s film will be licking their chops with ND right at the top of the list. I don’t expect we will get blown out next Saturday, but I’d be shocked to see this team go into South Bend and win after today. There are just too many problems.

Maybe I’m wrong and this season will turn around and be a great one, but I’m a lot less hopeful after this game. I want to believe in this team as a true Cal fan, and I generally like the players who appear to be great kids, but I’m growing so tired of Wilcox football. It’s boring. It’s maddening. And worst of all, it’s mediocre. It could be another long season, folks.

Another busy weekend of news and rumors:

We spread some responsibilities around last night as I was tied up the second half of the day with game coverage, but it looks like the postgame interviews never got posted. Here they are -- Jesse has a follow-up coming this morning too:

Login to view embedded media Login to view embedded media Login to view embedded media Login to view embedded media Login to view embedded media Login to view embedded media

Sounds about right. Wilcox will slow it down to not get blown out. My predicted score was going to be 28-13

So we’re heading to South Bend on Friday night. (Doing some Chicago stuff on Friday day). What should we do? Where should we brunch before the game and eat after? Any recommendations for Sunday morning?

We’re bringing a crew of four adults and 2 10-year-old boys, so anything more family/chill would be better.

Besides the alumni tailgate, is there any Cal events/tailgates we should seek out?

If you just read a few stats it does not look that bad. If you watch the game we are feeble on O except for Ott. Defense is CPU’s to b minusWe had all hoped for better. An angry Irish will curb stomp us in South Bend, we have no spark as a team. Very disappointed

After the 2022 season


Login to view embedded media

3-6 last week and 0-1 for my lock of the week: https://cal.forums.rivals.com/threads/lets-pick-the-pac-12-games-week-1.31302/

[home team in italics]

Utah by 45.5 over Southern Utah - Awful lot of points for a non great offense. Southern Utah covers.

Wisconsin by 16 over WSU - Nothing I saw by WSU this weekend suggested that they can keep this close. Wisconsin covers.

Air Force by 13.5 over Colorado - I'm fading colorado all year. Wouldn't be surprised for them to go wineless. Air Force covers.

Cal by 13 over UNLV - No idea how good UNLV is. They have a great wr and a decent qb, but not sure about anything else. Could see anything from a UNLV win to a cal blowout. Guess I'll take the points and UNLV.

UW by 28.5 over Portland State - UW is going to be a good team. Wish we could swap coaches. UW covers.

UCLA by 50.5 over Alabama State - Go Hornets! Alabama State covers.

USC by 11.5 over the Furd - Crazy line. People still think Shaw is good I guess. USC rolls.

Oklahoma State by 11 over ASU - ASU looks better than expected. OSU doesn't. ASU covers.

Oregon by 20 over Eastern Washington - If Oregon doesn't cover this look out below.

Fresno State by 1 over Oregon State - I think Oregon State is good. OSU covers.

Mississippi State by 14.5 over Arizona - Lot of points. Arizona covers.



Non conference lock of the week: BYU by 3.5 over Baylor - Baylor is legit good. Baylor covers.

I dunno, Musgrave might be a dud, his playcalling is annoying, but I can't get a clear barometer on how good he is because he's had to deal with McClure's absolute incompetence.

It's absurd asking this offense to be consistent if they're going to keep playing with three-and-a-half competent down linemen. Plummer had to spend the entire second half escaping the pocket or dumping that ball out quick. The tackle play has been horrendous.

Not one of his recruits aside from the transfers are playing. He's been here three years!

He was bad at UCLA as an O-line coach, he's not much better here, and he's bring nothing dev-wise for his recruits. We're stuck with Wilcox for awhile, so do another reset this winter.

Just an odious performance

I saw in the Merc today that Ott said that Scott was the fastest player on the team. Is he going to play in the NFL? He appears to have the measurables and he looks good on the field.

Is it safe to say that if Cal wins this game every last 4* & 5* recruit they offered will come back looking to commit to Cal?

Cougar Qb wild as a March hare but their offensive plays are confusing the badgers a few are getting open

If O'connell is only marginally better than Plummer, our offense is going to be VERY improved. Watching this Purdue vs Penn St. game, we might be just as good or better at every position than Purdue other than QB and online. I'd take our entire defense and receivers any day over theirs. Lets see if they can hang on and pull off the upset.

Get those picks in!